-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 819
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
style: Preparing for upcoming Checkstyle release 8.28 #1654
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1654 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 67.85% 68.82% +0.96%
- Complexity 4042 4088 +46
============================================
Files 181 181
Lines 16945 16957 +12
Branches 2774 2789 +15
============================================
+ Hits 11498 11670 +172
+ Misses 4175 4010 -165
- Partials 1272 1277 +5 |
@gmshake , please answer questions that are in issue template. Travis failure looks like unrelated to your change. |
b19f505
to
bb30c7e
Compare
It's weird that code style affects coverage. |
This looks good to me. @gmshake , do you expect more changes or should this be merged? |
this is all that we need. |
@vlsi
|
if any additional changes become required (caused by changes in pgjdbc repo) we will provide PR with fixes after release of checkstyle. I still highly recommend to use single stable version of checkstyle in pom, to have the same behavior on each contributor locals and in CI. |
Indeed. I've switched to 8.27 in d164cba |
All Submissions:
New Feature Submissions:
Changes to Existing Features:
Related issue: #1652